Purge, select, balance

Strategy = Execution

Sharp choices. purge, select, balance

In just 3 strides from orchestrated failure to a strategic portfolio that maximizes your chances of success. Being selective is a precondition for maximizing your chances of success in strategy execution. This blog post will show you how. This is the step you take in Building Block 2 of the Strategy Execution Model.

This building block, aptly named SELECTION, guides you through the process of purging your portfolio of strategic initiatives every year. You need to be very selective so that you can set clear assignments and define unambiguous requirements in terms of their execution. I will tell you why it is so crucial to be selective in your portfolio-setting: you must attune your aspirations to their feasibility. Some discrepancy and overreach is good, but only in moderation.

Orchestrated failure

In my 20+ years as a strategy execution consultant, I have never heard organizations complain that their capacity exceeds their ambition. Suppose you have a 500-employee organization. This organization could opt to execute a mission, vision and strategy with four programs and ten projects, or with two programs and four projects. The former is likely to fail while the latter stands a real chance of success. Organizations often overestimate their execution or change capacity and launch far too many new initiatives while others are still ongoing. They let initiatives and expectations pile up without any real link to their actual ability to change, and in so doing set themselves up for failure. You should therefore cull, consolidate or cluster your portfolio of strategic initiatives. If this is not possible, it may be smart to compress, slow down or stop some initiatives.

Purge at least once a year

Purging your portfolio is the shortest and the surest way to get results in strategy execution. Most organizations are overburdened by a host of rambling, sprawling, and overlapping projects. Some even have zombie projects, projects that sprawl because something is forever being added or subtracted. Such projects can almost grow into separate little businesses, with their own corporate culture.

Purge your portfolio at least once a year, and preferably twice a year, at the start of your business planning meeting. That creates both focus and room to breathe. As a consultant, I insist on a preliminary phase, before starting on any transformation program. In this ‘phase zero’, the client and I weed out their current portfolio of projects and programs. It’s something that doesn’t happen nearly as much as it should. This two-week phase is one of the easiest ways for clients to save money. And more importantly, to free up time, change capacity and resources.

Here are a few ‘fun facts’. In my experience,

33% of project work turns out to be routine, line organization work; and
33% of the project work in a portfolio has an overlapping mandate or scope

Select to fit your strategy

When selecting new initiatives, they must fit your strategy. That’s the main criterion. A good portfolio consists of well-aimed shots at a strategic target. How good your aim is, is determined by the four dimensions represented in the figure below. This is a practical, widely-used matrix meant for reviewing strategic initiatives and matching them to a company’s change capacity. This figure is highly valuable from a content and communication standpoint; if it’s not in the matrix, it doesn’t exist

Balance improvement, renewal and innovation

You’ve purged, you’ve selected, but you’re not done yet. In order to create a sound portfolio, you also need to assess whether you have struck a good balance between initiatives that are Type 1 (improvement), Type 2 (renewal) and Type 3 (innovation). Each type of change has its own appropriate execution horizon. A lean optimization project (Type 1) should be completed within a year. A business process redesign project (Type 2) should be completed within two years, and a greenfield innovation project should have a five-year horizon at most.

The right number of initiatives is the number at which you can attain the best balance between ambition and realism.

Balance ambition and realism

The second dimension for assessing your portfolio is risk and hence your chance of success. Risk is the vertical axis. It’s fairly obvious that Type 1 is low risk, Type 2 is moderate risk, and Type 3 is high risk. The third dimension is the total number of initiatives, and the number for each type. The right number of initiatives is the number at which you can attain the best balance between ambition and realism.

The fourth dimension is the initiative’s strategic value. That value can be expressed by the tint of the dot you use on your chart. The fifth dimension consists of assigning a code for the type of target an initiative is aimed at. Is it meant to address (A) share (of customers, revenue or market),(B) costs and productivity, (C) employee satisfaction, (D) flexibility, (E) effectiveness, (F) corporate social responsibility or (G) compliance? In answering this question, you can also weigh whether you are meeting the needs of your various stakeholders: customers, employees, shareholders, management and society.

Blunt message

Check the matrix to see whether it shows a neat incline. A well-balanced portfolio shows a nice diagonal line from top left to bottom right on the chart, and not the cliché hockey stick. You need all three types of initiatives. The unbalanced portfolios on the right side of the figure are a quick reference guide to determine if something is wrong. Some managers are flabbergasted when they see their company’s situation mapped out that way. A pattern of dots scattered all over the place sends a blunt message that you’re lacking focus. A combination of one or two lighter dots and a few very dark ones reflects a risky portfolio. If you see lots of dots near the bottom, you know you’re being too careful. And in case you didn’t know it, playing it safe is the riskiest thing you can do in volatile and disruptive times.

Make a “to-don’t” list.

“Organizations earn just as much by not doing things as by doing things,” one manager said. Explicitly describing what your organization does NOT do prevents opportunism. You want to make sure that pet projects that were eliminated during the portfolio recalibration are not sneaked back in by being included in the scope of another initiative. You want to avoid ‘container projects’. They’re doomed to fail.

Strategy = Execution. Improve, Renew and Innovate Faster

How can organizations make strategy execution their number one priority? And improve, renew and innovate faster? This I describe in my book Strategy = Execution. Strategy = execution is based on the research that Turner started years ago into the success factors of strategy execution and innovation. We interviewed 60 directors and professionals and analyzed more than 75 cases, 300 relevant books and articles.

Look inside Order your copy

More about Jacques Pijl (author) and Turner Consultancy.
The most popular interventions based on Strategy = Execution
24 endorsements from organizational leaders
American management book of the year 2021, no. 1 in the category of strategic management, in the top 100 bestseller, seventh edition, translated into: English, German, Spanish, Russian and Bahasa.
Selection of the most important management books according to CEOs of innovative organizations (FD New Champions). Included in library of classics (mb.nl).
Nominated for Management Book of the Year.
Countless articles and interviews in FD, Emerce, Frankwatching and CFO.
Numerous Ted Talks and in-company workshops at the top 25-50 organizations, average rating 8.7.