Turner’s research has shown that leaders and managers regard strategy execution as their No. 1 priority, but have difficulty grasping the concept. They consider it too broad a term, too “holistic” even. To clarify matters, we need to make a distinction between the going concern and innovation efforts. Making a distinction between Running the Business and Changing the Business is crucial because it simplifies and expedites matters. Failure to make this distinction leads to suboptimal performance on both fronts. In my years as a consultant I have seen plenty of organizations that opted to have their line organization deal with every execution challenge, even though it’s clear that most execution issues require a special focus and approach. The net result was an indistinguishable mess. By separating your change objectives from the going concern, you ensure you can properly manage and control both Running and Changing the Business, as figure 1 shows. In my study, many leaders admitted to having realized too late how important this distinction is.
Not only should we disentangle Running and Changing the Business, we must also distinguish between different Types of Change: Improvement, Renewal and Innovation (figure 2). Failing to make this distinction will once again create an indistinguishable mess. Obviously, every organization needs all three types of change, but also needs to find a way to offer a unique proposition. Every sexy startup that makes it big eventually becomes an established company. Even then, it needs to continue to innovate in order to remain successful. It must keep improving basic processes (Type 1 Change) and renewing its existing models (Type 2 Change).
Figure 1: The distinction between Running and Changing the Business and the Three Types of Change: Improvement, Renewal and Innovation.
Type 1: Improvement
Type 1 Change is about continuous improvement and development of existing revenue and business models, aka “operational excellence” Doing things better every day. That’s how one senior manager described Type 1 Change to me. Although we enjoy a high standard of living in the Western world, it is practically impossible to schedule a repair or a delivery when it suits you best, for instance evenings or weekends. So, there is ample room for improvement. Excelling in Type 1 Change builds credibility with customers and fosters an execution culture within the organization: “change begets change”! That, in turn, fuels Types 2 and 3 Strategy Execution.
Type 2: Renewal
Type 2 Change refers to an overhaul of existing revenue and business models. It’s the kind of change needed when the existing revenue and business model needs to be transformed in order to keep running the business. This may entail drastic measures to cut costs or raise productivity, or leveraging the synergy attained through takeovers, or a rigorous revision of your customer value propositions and service concepts. This type of change nearly always requires a fundamental breakthrough in one of your company’s key performance indicators, a real jump in performance.
Type 3: Innovation
Type 3 Change is all about radical digital innovation, totally new revenue and business models. Aka game changers. That is your best bet to secure the continuity of your organization. Because if you don’t disrupt the market, some other organization will. Thanks to digitalization we live in disruptive times, as I wrote in my previous blog post about my book Strategy = Execution. After all, how do you secure your earnings in a shrinking market when your existing business strongly depends on the commodity effect and profitability is shrinking year after year? No one can survive without innovation, but innovation can only be successful if it is manageable. Lee Iacocca once said, “The most successful leaders hold onto the old for as long as necessary and make the leap to the new as soon as this is the better move.”
Figure 2: Three types of strategy execution: Improvement, Renewal and Innovation.
Amazon once started as a hungry young startup with an innovative business model (Type 3 Change). But now it rigorously improves and renews itself every day (Types 1 and 2 Change). Google and Apple do the same; they make headlines with their new ideas (Type 3 Change), but maintain the stability of their existing product lines and revenue and business models by continually improving and renewing their existing business models (Types 1 and 2 Change). Every organization needs all three types of change. Figure 3 shows the differences in purpose and nature of these types of change.
Figure 3: The three types of strategy execution are fundamentally different in purpose and nature.
Strategy = Execution. Renew and innovate faster in the digital age.
How can organizations make strategy execution their No.1 priority?
And how can they learn to improve, renew and innovate faster? That’s the topic of the book Strategy = Execution. Based on Turner Consultancy’s research citing 60 organizational leaders, 75 case studies and 300 published sources, which answers the central question: What makes or breaks modern day strategy execution and innovation?
In 2021 Strategy = Execution was awarded a Gold Medal
from the prestigious American Business Book platform Axiom.
24 endorsements from organizational leaders
Strategy = Execution: Look inside
More about Jacques Pijl (author) and Turner Consultancy
The most popular interventions based on Strategy = Execution
Strategy Execution Masterclass, in-company or open application: Contact Wendelina Fieret (email@example.com)
More Strategy = Execution
One important factor determining the success of your strategy execution is your ability to avoid creating an indistinguishable mess. Mess, you say? Yes, exactly. Avoid creating a muddle. This means you need to make a clear distinction between realizing the objectives for your existing organizations and realizing new initiatives best run in separate projects.
Massive government IT projects that get bogged down, private sector mergers that never deliver the projected synergies, big restructurings that go off the rails, and cultural change programs that evaporate into thin air.
Strategy = Execution, the international edition of Jacques Pijl’s bestselling management classic, has been awarded with a no. 1 position by Axiom, a prestigious and leading American Business Book jury and platform. Consultancy.eu writes about this ‘Oscar’ for management books.
Strategy = Execution Scaling Requires a Modern Mindset in Change Management Some change management schools of thought believe that top-down, planned execution is a remnant
Strategy = Execution Keep the Minimum Viable Product as concise as possible In your search for a breakthrough value proposition for your customers, you need
Axiom Business Book Awards has awarded Strategy = Execution a gold medal. The English translation of Jacques Pijl’s Dutch bestseller won this year’s top distinction in the Business Theory category.
Strategy = Execution Why radical innovation requires a two-track approach As I argue in Strategy = Execution, radical innovation requires a separate, autonomous execution strategy,
Strategy = Execution Strategy Equals Execution Truer Than Ever in Times of Hyper Crisis In this blog Turner’s Jacques Pijl is giving recommendations for strategy-execution