WORK IN PROGRESS

From Distrust to Trust in the Relationship Between Policy and Implementation: Findings from a Roundtable Discussion with DUO and Prof. Sandra van Thiel

On November 23, Turner, in collaboration with Flevum, organized the fourth roundtable meeting for public sector administrators and executives on Strategy Execution within the “Werk aan Uitvoering” (WAU) initiative. During this session, we focused on the changes needed in the relationship between policy and implementation. Prof. Sandra van Thiel outlined, from a scientific perspective, what is needed to make this relationship function more effectively. Janika Horvath explained how DUO is addressing this in practice. What dilemmas arise in practice, and what can implementers do to strengthen trust?

Roundtable Discussions on Strategy Execution in the Implementation Phase

Public service providers are under social and political pressure to improve their services. By organizing roundtables, Turner aims to help public organizations turn strategic plans into reality. On the one hand, by facilitating the discussion. On the other hand, by offering insights and inspiring real-world examples. For example, Christiaan Gort, Practice Leader for the Public Sector at Turner, shared a key finding from his recent research on the effectiveness of Strategy Execution in public organizations.

This digital roundtable was part of a two-part series that began with an earlier meeting in October with Marjan Hammersma, Secretary-General of the Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science (OCW). At that time, we discussed what is needed within the triangle of politics, policy, and implementation to bring a more human touch to public services. During this session, we discussed the changes needed in the relationship between policy and implementation to strengthen public services.

Sandra van Tiel, Professor of Public Administration
Janika Horvath, Policy & Strategy Manager at DUO

From a Model of Distrust to One of Trust

The principal-agent model has long been the guiding framework for the relationship between policy departments and implementing organizations. This model assumes information asymmetry and is based on mistrust, control, and conflicting objectives. In recent years, the stewardship model has been receiving increasing attention. This model assumes equality of information and is based on trust, performance agreements, and shared objectives. The WAU report describes this model as the most suitable for future collaboration between implementing agencies and ministries. After all, this model is better suited to a Public sector that focuses on realizing public values and providing services grounded in a human-centered approach. This model requires implementing agencies to: 1) be more sensitive to political impact, 2) maintain an open attitude—including regarding problems (“no surprises”)—and 3) when faced with bottlenecks, first seek solutions on their own rather than immediately turning to the client for help.

The discussion reveals that collaboration in practice is not so black-and-white. Most organizations report having a hybrid model. The shift toward the stewardship model is underway, but implementing agencies find that clients still often act out of mistrust and a desire to control. Where the stewardship model is the guiding principle, participants note that when tensions arise, both the client and the service provider tend to revert to old patterns of behavior—namely, mistrust, control, and withholding information.

Dilemmas Call for Open Dialogue Amongst Ourselves

The roundtable participants face several dilemmas regarding the relationship between policy and implementation. The most common one is that insufficient attention is still being paid to feasibility during policy development.

The discussion revealed that collaboration becomes more complex when implementing organizations deal with multiple commissioning ministries. This requires organized coordination among commissioning entities, which is difficult in practice due to conflicting interests. This is also reflected in the management of supply chains. Policy departments primarily evaluate implementing organizations based on individual performance. The principal-agent model has led to organizations within the same chain (such as the criminal justice chain comprising the Police, the Public Prosecution Service, and the Judiciary) becoming competitors rather than partners. Yet they should be encouraged to work together to solve societal issues and improve service delivery. These dilemmas call for open discussions between implementing agencies and their clients and owners—about changes in management approaches, how to collaborate with trust on societal challenges, and what each party’s role is in this process.

Emancipation of the performance is needed

The necessary changes require a shift away from reliance on policy departments. Emancipation of implementation is necessary so that implementing agencies can establish a more equal relationship with policy departments. Instead of focusing primarily on the wishes and interests of their clients, public service providers must focus more on what citizens and social partners need. After all, public service providers have the best insight into what changes are needed in their own services and in the services provided with chain partners.“There is still a long way to go before trust can guide every level of the organization,”notes Christiaan Gort of Turner. “The direction has been set and the conversation has begun. Now the conversation must be translated into practical changes.” .

More insights into the public sectors and into "Werk Aan Uitvoering"

Public sector
Alexander Bruinsma

Give the performance room to breathe

Christiaan Gort of Turner writes on Platform O, the online platform for public administration, about the human touch in implementing organizations. What can politicians and policymakers do to bring that

Read morer »

Contact​

We would like to get to know you.
Do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions!

Huize de Boom
Arnhemseweg 107
3832 GK Leusden

Phone: +31 (0)33 – 285 93 00
Email: info@turner.nl

Make an appointment

Would you like more information or a tailor-made quote? Fill in the form for a no-obligation appointment.